Talk:Passive provider chest: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Passive as a source only chest) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Weird wording in intor == | |||
To my understanding the word 'only' refers to the direction, not destination. It is slightly confusing at first. | To my understanding the word 'only' refers to the direction, not destination. It is slightly confusing at first. | ||
| Line 4: | Line 6: | ||
Would it be worth to rephrase the sentence? I believe it now makes people switch to YT tutorials. | Would it be worth to rephrase the sentence? I believe it now makes people switch to YT tutorials. | ||
: The wording is a bit weird. If you can make it better, feel free to edit! Any edit that improves an article is worth it, no matter how big or small. [[User:TheWombatGuru|TheWombatGuru]] ([[User talk:TheWombatGuru|talk]]) 15:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:55, 4 February 2021
Weird wording in intor
To my understanding the word 'only' refers to the direction, not destination. It is slightly confusing at first.
Passive chest can be only a source for robots, and they don't return there any item (like after destruction). It also means that - as I see it - the most suitable usage is as a stock for assembled items (at a belt, as a buffer between belts or at the end of a belt).
Would it be worth to rephrase the sentence? I believe it now makes people switch to YT tutorials.
- The wording is a bit weird. If you can make it better, feel free to edit! Any edit that improves an article is worth it, no matter how big or small. TheWombatGuru (talk) 15:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)