Electric furnace: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|producers=Manual + Assembling machine 2 + Assembling machine 3 | |producers=Manual + Assembling machine 2 + Assembling machine 3 | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Interface == | |||
[[File:Electric_furnace.PNG|left|The interface of an electric furnace.]] | |||
'''Electric furnaces''' provide 2 module slots, which allow for more flexibility in special applications. The use of [[Electric network|electrical power]] eliminates the requirement for a [[Fuel]] supply chain, but at the cost of space. Electric furnaces are larger than [[Stone furnace|stone]] or [[Steel furnace|steel]] furnaces. | '''Electric furnaces''' provide 2 module slots, which allow for more flexibility in special applications. The use of [[Electric network|electrical power]] eliminates the requirement for a [[Fuel]] supply chain, but at the cost of space. Electric furnaces are larger than [[Stone furnace|stone]] or [[Steel furnace|steel]] furnaces. | ||
As electric furnaces consume a substantial amount of power, [[Module#Efficiency Module|Efficiency modules]] are a good option. This is much more space-efficient than using [[Solar panel|Solar panels]]. | As electric furnaces consume a substantial amount of power, [[Module#Efficiency Module|Efficiency modules]] are a good option. This is much more space-efficient than using [[Solar panel|Solar panels]]. | ||
<br clear=all> | <br clear=all> | ||
Revision as of 03:04, 23 August 2016
Interface
Electric furnaces provide 2 module slots, which allow for more flexibility in special applications. The use of electrical power eliminates the requirement for a Fuel supply chain, but at the cost of space. Electric furnaces are larger than stone or steel furnaces.
As electric furnaces consume a substantial amount of power, Efficiency modules are a good option. This is much more space-efficient than using Solar panels.