Talk:Research: Difference between revisions

From Official Factorio Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "This page requires a lot of updating to get to version 0.9.8 standards. I'm going through the individual techs, if someone could help with updating the images & the tech tree ...")
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
A good tech tree for reference: http://davemcw.com/factorio/tech-tree/
A good tech tree for reference: http://davemcw.com/factorio/tech-tree/
Seems almost perfect, only a few techs missing like iron working and the latest follower robot techs at first glance. And it can be a bit hard to follow all the lines exactly. [[User:Teurlinx|Teurlinx]] ([[User talk:Teurlinx|talk]]) 18:21, 23 May 2014 (CEST)
Seems almost perfect, only a few techs missing like iron working and the latest follower robot techs at first glance. And it can be a bit hard to follow all the lines exactly. [[User:Teurlinx|Teurlinx]] ([[User talk:Teurlinx|talk]]) 18:21, 23 May 2014 (CEST)
And a proposal for the various technologies which have the same name as the effect - e.g. Speed module 1 & speed module 1 (research) - I suggest we merge the research page with the page for the item. I don't see a good reason to have the current confusing setup where they are separate. [[User:Teurlinx|Teurlinx]] ([[User talk:Teurlinx|talk]]) 20:41, 23 May 2014 (CEST)

Revision as of 18:41, 23 May 2014

This page requires a lot of updating to get to version 0.9.8 standards. I'm going through the individual techs, if someone could help with updating the images & the tech tree (tree diagram) that would be an immense help. I'm not too sure about how the formatting for that works yet.

A good tech tree for reference: http://davemcw.com/factorio/tech-tree/ Seems almost perfect, only a few techs missing like iron working and the latest follower robot techs at first glance. And it can be a bit hard to follow all the lines exactly. Teurlinx (talk) 18:21, 23 May 2014 (CEST)

And a proposal for the various technologies which have the same name as the effect - e.g. Speed module 1 & speed module 1 (research) - I suggest we merge the research page with the page for the item. I don't see a good reason to have the current confusing setup where they are separate. Teurlinx (talk) 20:41, 23 May 2014 (CEST)