Talk:Research: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: with the wiki generator I'm currently writing, this should be an easier task. I recommend to put not too much work into it. See https://github.com/alexaulbach/FactorioLua2WikiGenerator ... [[User:Ssilk|Ssilk]] ([[User talk:Ssilk|talk]]) 09:11, 27 May 2014 (CEST) | : with the wiki generator I'm currently writing, this should be an easier task. I recommend to put not too much work into it. See https://github.com/alexaulbach/FactorioLua2WikiGenerator ... [[User:Ssilk|Ssilk]] ([[User talk:Ssilk|talk]]) 09:11, 27 May 2014 (CEST) | ||
:: Don't worry about working on the individual pages, I've got that covered. If you could automate the creation of the tech tree and list of technologies, that'd be a better use of your time. [[User:WiduX|WiduX]] ([[User talk:WiduX|talk]]) 17:56, 27 May 2014 (CEST) | |||
---- | |||
The research formula takes into account the modules when calculating S, but it doesn't include it when calculating for P. How could this be formatted? I don't want to make it more confusing... [[User:Kathrynn|Kathrynn]] ([[User talk:Kathrynn|talk]]) 16:26, 27 Nov 2019 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:26, 27 November 2019
This page requires a lot of updating to get to version 0.9.8 standards. I'm going through the individual techs, if someone could help with updating the images & the tech tree (tree diagram) that would be an immense help. I'm not too sure about how the formatting for that works yet.
A good tech tree for reference: http://davemcw.com/factorio/tech-tree/ Seems almost perfect, only a few techs missing like iron working and the latest follower robot techs at first glance. And it can be a bit hard to follow all the lines exactly. Teurlinx (talk) 18:21, 23 May 2014 (CEST)
And a proposal for the various technologies which have the same name as the effect - e.g. Speed module 1 & speed module 1 (research) - I suggest we merge the research page with the page for the item. I don't see a good reason to have the current confusing setup where they are separate. Teurlinx (talk) 20:41, 23 May 2014 (CEST)
- with the wiki generator I'm currently writing, this should be an easier task. I recommend to put not too much work into it. See https://github.com/alexaulbach/FactorioLua2WikiGenerator ... Ssilk (talk) 09:11, 27 May 2014 (CEST)
The research formula takes into account the modules when calculating S, but it doesn't include it when calculating for P. How could this be formatted? I don't want to make it more confusing... Kathrynn (talk) 16:26, 27 Nov 2019 (UTC)